Pace
"Nature is a temple, where, from living pillars, confused words are sometimes allowed to escape; here man passes, through forests of symbols, which watch him with looks of recognition."Charles Baudelaire 1821-1867
If I were to state that art imitates life, and therefore film is but a derivative of life, then 'Nature' being a 'temple' allows humans to pass through and witness the symbols that exist. I crave for these symbols in film, and I watch each film fervently trying to identify them. In many ways it has to do with the pace of the film that is being presented, which may indicate the amount of symbolism that is prevalent. The faster the pace, it seems, the fewer the symbols or clues to the point perhaps where they are non existent. Has Hollywood forgotten that humans pass through this world looking at symbols, identifying with them, relating their life to them?
Two totally different films where the pace differs dramatically. Obviously...Iron Man is an action film and will be fast and furious, but this here is exactly my point. It lacks the substance that can only be derived by embracing and enjoying the symbols in life. The film has no symbols, nuances, intricate webs that can enrich my vision of what nature has to offer. Even though it is not that type of film, and even though it has grossed nearly a billion world wide, does it not have that responsibility to the viewer as a film? I hate to say this, but I enjoyed Back to Stay a lot more. It was slow, I could absorb it, feel it, drink it like a long black by the fire, and as for those symbols; there were many, but, it was the vibrating bed, once owned by the grandmother, that won me over. Symbolically what that could mean or be interpreted as, I'll leave entirely for you to consider.
Stella Dimadis 2013
Comments
Post a Comment